Alien Enemies Act, Trump and Tren de Aragua
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Reactions and opinions
Associated Press News |
The act gives allows noncitizens to be deported without the opportunity to go before an immigration or federal court judge.
USA Today |
The first migrants to be targeted by the Social Security Administration are convicted criminals and "suspected terrorists," according to the New York Times.
Reuters |
In response, Taylor said via text message: "I said this would happen. Dissent isn’t unlawful. It certainly isn’t treasonous. America is headed down a dark path."
Read more on News Digest
The Supreme Court ruling that permits President Donald Trump to use a centuries-old wartime authority to speed deportations is drawing sharp criticism from immigration experts who fear the decision could erode migrants’ due process rights to have their cases reviewed before they’re sent to a foreign prison.
After the Supreme Court dismissed a nationwide legal challenge on technical grounds, lawyers for immigrants filed a lawsuit in New York and plan to file more in other states.
A case involving a Venezuelan migrant, Daniel Zacarias Matos, could explore the question of whether President Trump has used the Alien Enemies Act in a lawful manner.
DC District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg had blocked President Trump from invoking the rarely used wartime law last month, and later extended his temporary restraining order until at least
The actions came after lawyers sued in defense of the Venezuelans who are at risk of removal from the US under a law that gives the president the power to deport noncitizens in times of war.
Explore more
35m
The New Republic on MSNWhat the Supreme Court Got Wrong About Habeas PetitionsThe recent Supreme Court ruling on President Donald Trump’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act nodded to the importance of due process in American jurisprudencce. In their opinion finding that the Trump administration could resume removal of Venezuelans with alleged gang ties under the Alien Enemies Act,